![]() | Protein-Energy Requirements of Developing Countries: Evaluation of New Data (UNU, 1981, 268 p.) |
![]() | ![]() | Research papers: Protein requirements-adults, standard protocols |
![]() | ![]() | Protein requirements of adult Thai males |
![]() |
|
Objective
Experimental
details
Summary of main
results
Acknowledgements
Kraisid Tontisirin, Prapaisri P. Sirichakawal, and Aree Valyasevi
Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, and Institute of
Nutrition, Mahidol University, Bangkok,
Thailand
To determine, by the nitrogen balance response method, the physiological needs for high-quality protein (hen's egg) in healthy adult Thai male subjects.
1. Subjects
Thirteen adult male Thai students and
laboratory assistants participated in the study. Table 1 shows their
characteristics. They were healthy and well-nourished, based on medical history,
physical examination, urinalysis, stool examination, chest x-ray, and a routine
complete blood count.
2. Study Environment
The entire study was conducted at
the clinical research ward (a metabolic unit) in Ramathibodi Hospital.
Temperature and humidity were those typical of tropical countries.
3. Physical Activity
The subjects were allowed to
continue their usual activities but not to participate in competitive, heavy
sports.
TABLE 1. Initial Characteristics of 13 Adult Thai Male Subjects
Subject | Age (years) | Weight (kg) | Height (cm) |
M.P.* | 24 | 45.0 | 166.0 |
V.D.* | 25 | 55.0 | 166.5 |
S.R.* | 23 | 56.5 | 169.0 |
S.S.* | 21 | 67.5 | 164.5 |
M.K. | 24 | 55.5 | 165.4 |
T.P. | 21 | 51.9 | 161.0 |
G.P. | 24 | 49.7 | 163.0 |
S.K. | 27 | 50.5 | 171.0 |
S.R. | 23 | 57.5 | 169.0 |
C.N. | 23 | 59.0 | 163.0 |
A.P. | 19 | 47.0 | 169.0 |
S.S. | 21 | 69.0 | 164.0 |
M.P. | 23 | 46.8 | 166.0 |
Mean | 22.9 | 54.7 | 165.9 |
S.D. | 2.1 | 7.4 | 2.9 |
* Also participated in study on obligatory nitrogen losses.
4. Duration of the Study
Five men were studied for 55
days with protein intakes of 0.20, 0.35, 0.50, and 0.65 g/kg/day. Eight men were
studied for 41 days with protein intakes of 0.55, 0.70, and 0.85 g/kg/day,
during three experimental periods, respectively.
Each experimental period was of 10 days, duration, preceded by 1 day on a protein free diet and followed by 3 days on a free-choice diet between experimental periods. The sequence of protein administration was assigned randomly.
TABLE 2. Multivitamin and Mineral Supplements (Tablets)*
Vitamins |
Minerals | ||
Vitamin A | 2,500±.U. | Calcium | 25 mg |
Vitamin D2 | 250±.U. | Phosphorus | 19.3 mg |
Thiamine mononitrate | 2.5 mg | Iron | 5 mg |
Ribafiavin | 2.5 mg | Copper | 0.75 mg |
Nicocotinamide | 10 mg | iodine | 0.05 mg |
Pyridoxine hydrochloride | 2.5 mg | Manganese | 0.5 mg |
Folic acid | 0.25 mg | Magnesium | 0.5 mg |
Ca.pantothenate | 5 mg | Potassium | 1 mg |
Cyanocobalamin | 0.001 mg | Zinc | 0.5 mg |
Ascorbic acid | 37.5 mg | ||
Vitamin E | 1 mg | ||
Vitamin K | 0.2 mg |
* Panvitan-M, manufactured by Takeda (Thailand, Ltd., Bangkok.
5. Diets
Hen's egg was the protein source, fed
scrambled and mixed with mung bean noodles at lunch and supper. The daily energy
intake was kept constant at about 45 kcal/kg/day. Fat provided approximately 30
per cent of the daily energy intake. Vitamin and mineral tables (see table 2)
were given twice each day. Water intake was provided ad libitum, but the volume
was recorded daily.
6. Indicators and Measurements
a. The total nitrogen in
diet, urine, and faeces was measured by a calorimetric semi-automated procedure
(Munro and Fleck, Mammalian Protein Metabolism, vol. 3,1969). True nitrogen
balance was calculated for urinary nitrogen during the last five days and for
faecal nitrogen during the last eight days of each period. Fat in food and
faecal samples was measured by Van de Kamer's method. Food and faecal energy
were measured by bomb calorimetry (Parr Adiabatic Calorimeter). b. Basal
metabolic rate (BMR) was measured daily and at the end of each dietary period
with a respirometer (closed circuit). c. Body weight was recorded daily. d.
Analyses of serum: Total proteins and albumin; urea nitrogen; and aspartate and
alanine aminotransferases (AST and ALT) were determined at the beginning and at
the end of each dietary
period.
1. Nitrogen Balance
Tables 3 and 4 show the nitrogen
balance data. "True" balance was calculated assuming miscellaneous
nitrogen losses of 5 mg/kg/day. Most men were in negative nitrogen balance with
protein intakes up to 0.7 g/kg/day. At the highest level of intake (0.85
g/kg/day), five men were within + 2 mg N/kg/day of equilibrium and the other
three had a positive nitrogen balance.
The individual regression equations of nitrogen balance on intake are shown in table 5. The intercept at zero balance of individuals ranged from 83.4 to 140.4 mg/N/kg/day, with the mean of the group 123.6 + 17.1 mg N/kg/day, or 0.77 + 0.11 9 protein/kg/day.
2. Other Measurements
Tables 6A and 6B show various
parameters measured before the beginning of the study and at the end of each
dietary period,
During the first study, BMR showed no significant changes, while total serum protein and albumin levels were increased at the low levels of protein intake. In addition, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) decreased significantly during the two low levels of protein intake of 0.20 and 0.35 g/kg/day, and there were also significant increases in AST and ALT activities, the non-essential/essential amino acid ratio, and the glycine/valine ratio when the protein intakes were decreased from 0.65 to 0.20 g/kg/day. For the second study, BMR was significantly lower at the highest intake, while changes occurred in faecal energy losses, fat absorption, and serum albumin at the end of each dietary period compared with the initial values. BUN decreased significantly at the end of all dietary periods. AST and ALT activities increased significantly only at the end of the dietary period in which protein intake was 0.55 g/kg/day.
TABLE 3. True Nitrogen Balance (mg N/kg/day) of Five Adult Thai Males Given Four Levels of Hen's Egg Protein.
Subject | Nl | UN | FN | TN | Nitrogen balance |
M.P. | 37.3 | 43.5 | 23.1 | 71.6 | -34.3 |
V.D. | 38.9 | 33.7 | 18.9 | 57.6 | -18.7 |
S.R. | 38.2 | 55.2 | 18.0 | 78.2 | -40.0 |
S.S. | 36.4 | 39.1 | 26.3 | 70.4 | -34.0 |
M.K. | 36.2 | 42.2 | 20.7 | 67.9 | -31.7 |
x ±S.D. | 37.4±1.2 | 42.74±7.9 | 21.4+3.4 | 69.14+7.5 | -31.7±7.9 |
M.P. | 53.8 | 47.2 | 17.2 | 69.5 | -15.7 |
V.D. | 54.8 | 48.0 | 21.3 | 74.3 | -19.5 |
S.R. | 55.9 | 38.1 | 18.0 | 61.1 | - 5.2 |
S.S. | 57.0 | 50.3 | 18.8 | 74.1 | -17.0 |
M.K. | 57.1 | 58.4 | 24.4 | 87.8 | -30.7 |
x +S.D. | 55.72±1.4 | 48.4±7.3 | 20.0±7.3 | 73.4±9.7 | -17.7±9.1 |
M.P. | 86.7 | 56.4 | 24.7 | 86.1 | + 0.6 |
V.D. | 80.7 | 54.4 | 22.5 | 81.9 | - 1.2 |
S.R. | 80.9 | 69.6 | 23.5 | 98.1 | -17.2 |
S.S. | 80.6 | 61.5 | 16.7 | 83.2 | - 2.6 |
M.K. | 80.0 | 70.3 | 19.3 | 96.6 | -14.61 |
x ±S.D. | 81.8±2.8 | 62.4±7.3 | 21.3±3.3 | 89.2±3.3 | - 7.0±8.3 |
M.P. | 110.4 | 87.1 | 25.3 | 117.4 | - 7.0 |
V.D. | 235.7 | 79.0 | 22.9 | 106.9 | +28.8 |
S.R. | 105.7 | 93.2 | 20.7 | 118.9 | -13.3 |
S.S. | 91.1 | 70.1 | 25.9 | 101.0 | - 9.9 |
M.K. | 109.5 | 89.1 | 24.0 | 118.1 | - 8.7 |
x ±S.D. | 110.5±16.1 | 83.7±9.2 | 23.8±2.1 | 112.5±8.1 | -2.0±17.4 |
* Nl, UN, FN, and TN represent daily nitrogen intake, urinary nitrogen, faecal nitrogen, and total nitrogen excretion, which included 5 mg N/kg/day for cutaneous losses.
TABLE 4. True Nitrogen Balance (mg N/kg/day) in Eight Adult Thai Males Given Three Levels of Hen's Egg Protein*
Subject | IN | UN | FN | TN | Nitrogen balance |
T.P. | 89.7 | 72.9 | 24.8 | 102.7 | - 13.0 |
G.P. | 86.9 | 73.0 | 22.9 | 100.9 | - 14.0 |
S.K. | 89.5 | 84.5 | 23.4 | 112.9 | - 23.4 |
S.R. | 84.3 | 83.4 | 23.7 | 112.1 | - 27.8 |
C.N. | 83.2 | 80.4 | 30.3 | 115.7 | - 32.5 |
A.P. | 76.2 | 86.3 | 19.1 | 110.4 | - 34.1 |
S.S. | 98.3 | 73.3 | 20.5 | 98.8 | - 0.6 |
M.P. | 118.3 | 84.2 | 28.7 | 117.9 | + 0.4 |
x±S.D. | 90.8+12.8 | 79.8±5.8 | 24.2+3.8 | 108.9±7.2 | - 18.1±13.5 |
T.P. | 107.3 | 78.5 | 22.9 | 106.5 | + 0.9 |
G.P. | 105.0 | 92.8 | 24.6 | 122.4 | - 17.4 |
S.K. | 107.0 | 99.7 | 16.8 | 121.5 | - 14.5 |
S.R. | 124.2 | 107.9 | 21.4 | 134.3 | - 10.1 |
C.N. | 113.3 | 89.9 | 27.8 | 122.7 | - 9.4 |
A.P. | 125.4 | 102.1 | 21.7 | 128.8 | - 3.4 |
S.S. | 106.8 | 83.2 | 25.0 | 113.2 | - 9.5 |
M.P. | 105.4 | 89.8 | 26.8 | 121.7 | - 16.3 |
x±S.D. | 118.8±8.4 | 93.0±9.8 | 23.4±3.5 | 121.4+8.6 | - 10.0+6.3 |
T.P. | 140.5 | 110.5 | 23.7 | 139.1 | + 1.4 |
G.P. | 137.9 | 104.5 | 26.2 | 135.7 | + 2.2 |
S.K. | 133.3 | 108.6 | 19.3 | 132.9 | + 0.4 |
S.R. | 135.4 | 113.3 | 18.4 | 136.7 | - 1.3 |
C.N. | 138.3 | 101.4 | 23.9 | 130.3 | + 8.0 |
A.P. | 139.4 | 99.8 | 33.6 | 138.4 | + 1.1 |
S.S. | 134.3 | 98.2 | 24.2 | 127.4 | + 6.9 |
M.P. | 149.1 | 106.0 | 15.4 | 126.3 | +22.8 |
x±S. D. | 138.5±5.0 | 105.3+5.3 | 23.1±5.6 | 133.4±4.9 | 5.2±7.8 |
* See note to table 3.
TABLE 5. Linear Regression Line of Nitrogen Balance Response (mg N/kg/day) of 13 Adult Thai Males Given Four Levels of Hen's Egg Protein
Subject | Individual linear regression line | Intercept, y = 0 |
M.P. | y = - 41.19±0.37x | 111.3 |
V.D. | y = - 43.35± 0.52 x | 83.4 |
S.R. | V = - 37.74 ± 0.27 x | 139.8 |
S.S. | y = - 48.67 ± 0.49 x | 99.3 |
M.K. | y = - 46.20 ± 0.35 x | 132.0 |
T.P. | y= - 31.53 ± 0.25x | 126.1 |
G.P. | y = - 48.35 ± 0.35 x | 138.1 |
S.K. | y = - 72.33 ± 0.54 x | 133.9 |
S.R. | y = - 70.18 ± 0.50 x | 140.4 |
C.N | Y = - 93.44 ± 0.74 x | 126.3 |
A.P. | y = - 77.49 ± 0.57 x | 136.0 |
S.S. | y = - 35.25 ± 0.30 x | 117.5 |
M.P. | y = - 104.96 ± 0.86 x | 122.1 |
Mean ± S.D. | 123.6 ± 17.1* |
Conclusions Nitrogen balance data indicated the adequacy of protein intake at 0.85 g/kg/day in seven of eight subjects, while only one of the eight reached balance on an intake of 0.70 g/kg/day. The enzyme activities of AST and ALT also showed no changes during this dietary period. Since there were technical problems with the amino acid autoanalyser, serum amino acid levels are not available. The mean protein requirement of these subjects, based on the linear regression analysis of nitrogen balance response of individuals, was 123.6 + 17.1 mg N/kg/day, or 0.77 + 0.11 9 protein/kg/day. if 97.5 per cent of the population is expected to be covered, the safe level of intake would be mean + 2 standard deviations, or equivalent to 157.8 mg N/kg/day, or 0.99 9 protein/kg/day. This safe level of protein intake is clearly higher than the 0.57 9 protein/kg/day recommended by the FAD/WHO Expert Committee.
TABLE 6A. Basal Metabolic Rate, Blood Chemistry Values, and Amino Acid Ratio (Mean ± S.D.) of Five Adult Thai Males Given Four Levels of Hen's Egg Protein
Protein intake (g/kg/day) | |||||
Measurement |
Initial value |
0.20 |
0.35 |
0.50 |
0.65 |
BMR (kcal/m²/day) |
987 ± 236 |
991 ± 103 |
972 ± 83 |
838 ± 77 |
919 ± 150 |
Total protein (g/dl) |
6.7 ± 0.9 |
7.6 ± 0.6 |
6.7 ± 0.6 |
6.6 ± 0.6 |
7.2 ± 0.4 |
Albumin (g/dl) |
4.3 ± 0.2 |
4.9 ± 0.7* |
4.6 ± 0.1 * |
4.5 ± 0.2* |
4.8 ± 0.3 |
BUN (mg/dl) |
8.7 ± 4.2 |
2.6 ± 2.2* |
3.0 ± 0.9* |
4.4 ± 2.0 |
5.3 ± 1.0 |
AST (sigma unit) |
15.9 ± 2.4 |
33.8 ± 9.4* |
26.0 ± 6.1 * |
24.8 ± 6.3* |
20.9 ± 3.3* |
ALT (sigma unit) |
12.8 ± 3.1 |
26.6 ± 3.8* |
30.8 ± 10.9* |
32.2 ± 5.6* |
22.9 ± 3.1* |
NEA/EA ratio |
2.2 ± 0.3 |
3.3 ± 0.1 * |
3.1 ± 0.3* |
2.7 ± 0.2* |
2.5 ± 0.1* |
Glycine/valine ratio |
1.2 ± 0.9 |
2.0 ± 0.2 |
1.9 ± 0.3 |
1.5 ± 0.1 |
1.2 ± 0.2* |
* Comparing with initial value p < 0.05.
TABLE 6B. Basal Metabolic Rate and Other Biochemical Values in Eight Adult Thai Males Given Three Levels of Hen's Egg Protein
Protein intake (g/kg/day) | ||||
Measurement |
Initial value |
0.55 |
0.70 |
0.85 |
BMR (kcal/m² /day) |
935 ± 125 |
821 ± 128 |
821 ± 170 |
771 ± 129* |
Faecal energy loss (% of intake) |
5.3 ± 1.0 |
5.1 ± 2.0 |
5.7 ± 0.9 | |
Fat absorption (% of intake) |
96.0 ± 1.4 |
95.8 ± 1.2 |
96.6 ± 1.1 | |
Total protein (g/dl) |
7.0 ± 0.6 |
7.6 ± 0.6 |
7.2 ± 0.6* |
6.9 ± 0.5 |
Albumin (g/dl) |
4.5 ± 0.5 |
4.2 ± 0.7 |
4.8 ± 0.3 |
4.7 ± 0.6 |
BUN (mg/dl) |
10.8± 1.5 |
6.0 ± 1.7* |
7.4 ± 1.7* |
8.1 ± 1.0* |
AST (sigma unit) |
14.2 ± 5.3 |
18.4 ± 4.9* |
20.4 ± 10.1 |
15.5 ± 7.8 |
ALT (sigma unit) |
14.4 ± 7.6 |
18.8 ± 9.5* |
21.8 ± 14.1 |
16.9 ± 11.0 |
* Comparing with initial value p < 0.05.
This study was supported by the research fund of the World Hunger Programme of the United Nations University. We would like to thank Dr. V. Tanphaichitr for medical care of the subjects, the staffs of the clinical research ward and food analysis laboratory, Ramathibodi Hospital, for their assistance, and the subjects who cooperated throughout the study.