![]() | Protein-Energy Requirements of Developing Countries: Evaluation of New Data (UNU, 1981, 268 p.) |
![]() | ![]() | Protein-energy requirements-children |
![]() | ![]() | Capacity of habitual Guatemalan diets to satisfy protein requirements of pre-school children with adequate dietary energy intakes |
![]() |
|
Objective
Experimental
details
Summary of main
results
Comments
Conclusions
Benjamin Tord Fernando E. Viteri
Institute of
Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Guatemala City,
Guatemala
To assess whether a diet considered customary among certain segments of the pre school-age population of Guatemala supplied adequate amounts of protein, provided that:
1. Subjects
A few children vomited occasionally and sometimes had slight increments in rectal temperature (<38.5° C) without other signs or symptoms of disease.
2. Study Environment
INCAP's Clinical Centre in
Guatemala City; 1,500 metres above sea level. Temperature 18 to 24 C. Relative
humidity 40 to 60 per cent. All children spent four to six hours each day
outdoors on the grounds and playing area around the Clinical Centre, except on
rainy days.
3. Physical Activity
The children were encouraged to be
as physically active as healthy children who live in a good home environment.
This was done through daily outdoor walks in the areas around the Clinial Centre
and participation in games and other activities that required walking, running,
jumping, or climbing. They were never forced to participate in those activities
when they did not feel like doing so, nor were they ever pushed to exhaustion.
Such activities alternated with periods of rest or sedentary play to avoid
boredom or fatigue.
4. Duration of the Study
The children ate the
experimental diets for at least 11 weeks, divided into the fol lowing periods:
TABLE 1. Average Composition and Frequency of Consumption of Diets Customary for Many Children of Pre-school Age in Guatemala
Food |
Intake per day (g) |
Frequency of intake (days/week) |
Weekly intake | ||
Amount (g) |
Protein (g) |
Energy (kcal) | |||
Corn tortilla flour |
105 |
7 |
735 |
67.6 |
2,734 |
Black bean flour |
18 |
7 |
126 |
27.8 |
423 |
Bread (sweet roll), fresh |
37 |
7 |
259 |
19.7 |
1,000 |
Vegetables (chayote, squash,or potatoes), raw |
44 |
7 |
308 |
5.8 |
163 |
Milk products (as fluid milk equivalents) |
100 |
3 |
300 |
9.9 |
195 |
Fruit (orange, apple, banana),fresh |
30 |
4 |
120 |
0.6 |
60 |
Egg, fresh |
43 |
2 |
86 |
9.9 |
142 |
Meat, raw (as beef equivalent) |
40 |
1 |
40 |
7.6 |
97 |
Sugar |
42 |
7 |
294 |
- |
1,176 |
Oil or lard |
5 |
7 |
35 |
- |
315 |
Total intake per week |
148.9 |
6,305 | |||
Mean intake per day |
21.3 |
901 | |||
Mean intake/kg/day (assuming weight of 12 kg) |
1.78 |
75 | |||
Bean: corn ratio = 15:85 by weight and 29:71 by protein contents | |||||
Animal protein = 18% of total | |||||
Energy from fat (including natural fat content of all foods) = 17% of total |
TABLE 2. Menus Offered to the Children a
Days | Breakfast (7 a.m.) | Lunch (11 a.m.) | Dinner (6.30 p.m.) | ||
corn and beans b | corn
and beans sweet breads | corn and beans sweet bread | |||
+ | + | + | |||
Mon. | egg (1 unit) a | apple | chayote d | ||
Tue. | potatoes | apple | potatoes | ||
Wed. | chayote | beef (40 g) a | apple | ||
Thu. | squash | potatoes | potatoes | ||
Fri. | egg (1 unit) a | squash | squash | ||
Sat. | potatoes | apple | potatoes | ||
Sun. | chayote | chayote | potatoes | ||
Afternoon snack (3 p.m.):
sweet bread (13 g) a + Mon., Wed., Sat.: milk (100 ml) a Tue., Thu., Sun.: lemonade (200 ml) a | Night drink (8 p.m.):
lemonade or water |
a All foods offered ad libitum, except when noted otherwise.
b
Corn-based beverage (atole), soft corn bread (tamal), and mashed black bean
puree.
c Sweet bread dough prepared with sugar and lard,
d Chayote =
Sechium edule.
5. Diet
6. Indicators and Measurements
a. Metabolic-balance
studies: Most of the children were not toilettrained. To avoid excessive
limitations of physical activity, complete 24-hour urine and faecal collections
were obtained at 4-day intervals so that every 28 days excrete corresponding to
the seven different menus for each day of the week were collected. Urine
collection began after the first morning micturition and ended after a
micturition 22 to 26 hours later; volumes were adjusted to 24-hour periods.
Faeces were collected between carmine red and charcoal faecal markers fed with
breakfast on 2 consecutive days. When the two markers were excreted together or
when there were other problems, such as losses of excrete, collections were
repeated on the same day of the following week. Faeces were homogenized and
dried. Their nitrogen and energy concentrations were measured in aliquots of
powdered faeces by Kjeldahl analysis and bomb calorimetry, respectively. Urinary
nitrogen was also determined by a Kjeldahl procedure. Each food was served in a
separate dish or cup at every meal. The amounts eaten by a child were measured
by weighing the corresponding containers before and after each meal, accounting
for any additional servings or for losses by spillage. Aliquots of each food, as
served to the children, were analysed at least four times during the study using
the same methods as those for faeces. Tryptophan and benzoic acid were used as
standards in each Kjeldahl and bomb calorimeter run, respectively. Total daily
intakes of protein (nitrogen x 6.25) and gross energy (by bomb calorimetry) were
calculated multiplying by the amounts of each food ingested.
Nitrogen balance ("apparent") was calculated by subtracting urinary and faecal nitrogen from intake. No corrections were made for integumental and other insensible nitrogen losses.
TABLE 3. Vitamin and Mineral Supplements Administered Daily
Vitamin A | 2,500 | I.U . |
Vitamin B1 | 1 | mg |
Vitamin B2 | 0.5 | mg |
Niacinamide | 5 | mg |
Vitamin B6 | 0.5 | mg |
Pantothenic acid | 5 | mg |
Folic acid | 30 | mog |
Vitamin Bl2 | 2 | mcg |
Biotin | 50 | mcg |
Vitamin C | 25 | mg |
Vitamin D | 500 | I.U. |
Vitamin E | 1.5 | mg |
Iron (as ferrous sulphate) | 60 | mg |
iodine (as Kl) | 100 | mcg |
Manganese sulphate | 0.9 | mg |
Zinc sulphate | 1 | mg |
Net energy intake was calculated as the gross value intake minus faecal energy (by bomb calorimetry). This value was used to calculate the contribution of dietary protein to total energy intake (P%), assuming that each 9 of protein ingested corresponded to 4 kcal of metabolized energy. The dietary energy retained was calculated by subtracting urinary nitrogen energy (estimated as 5 kcal/g urinary nitrogen) from the net intake. Energy balance was calculated by subtracting the total energy expenditure, as described below, and sweat losses (estimated as 0.1 kcal/kg/day, based on 8 kcal/g sweat nitrogen) from the dietary energy retained.
The daily metabolic-balance data were combined in 28-day periods that included intakes and excrete corresponding to each of the 7 days of the week. These periods were termed I and 11.
Apparent digestibility of nitrogen and apparent absorption of energy were calculated from the combined gross intakes and faecal excrete of a 28-day period.
It was assumed that collection days when a child ate little food or did not defecate much would be balanced by other collection days with higher intakes or greater faecal excretions. During collection days the children who were not toilet-trained remained in a metabolic bed during the hours in which it was expected that they would defecate and while they slept; at other times they moved and played around freely while wearing urine collection bags.
b. Basal oxygen consumption: This was measured with an oxygen diaferometer at 1 B-day intervals, each time on two separate occasions not more than 3 days apart; the lower of the two results was considered as basal. Basal conditions were defined as after a minimum of eight hours of sleep and ten hours of fasting. Measurements were done while the child was sleeping, sometimes after oral administration of chloral hydrate (4 mg/kg). Energy expenditure was calculated by indirect calorimetry, assuming a respiratory quotient of 0.82.
c. Total energy expenditure: Physical activity and energy expenditure were quantified by monitoring the children's heart rate (HR) throughout the day and calculating energy expenditure from individual determinations of heart rate and oxygen consumption (VO2). The HR-VO2 relationship was determined in each child at 14- to 21-day intervals. Heart rate was continuously monitored for at least 10 days within ± 7 days of determining the HR-VO2 relationship. Total daily energy expenditure was calculated from each child's heart rate and his corresponding heart rate-energy-expenditure relationship from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. (14 hours), and from his basal energy expenditure from 8 p.m. to 6 a.m. of the following day (10 hours).
d. Anthropometry: The children were weighed naked before breakfast each morning. Body length ("height"), right arm circumference, and subcutaneous skin-fold thickness (tricipital, subscapular, and paraumbilical) were measured initially and at 14-day intervals.
e. Urinary creatinine excretion: This was measured in the 24-hour urine collections obtained for nitrogen balance. An alkaline picrate method (Jaffe) was used. The creatinine-height index (CHI ) was computed, and running or weekly averages were calculated, including and excluding data from the days when meat was eaten.
f. Other biochemical and haematological determinations: Venous blood was drawn initially and at 18-day intervals. Packed cell volume (microcentrifuge) and the concentrations of blood haemoglobin (cyanomethaemoglobin), plasma proteins (refractometry), and serum albumin (bromcresol purple) were determined, as well as the ratio of serum non-essential/essential amino acids (Whitehead).
g. Statistical analysis: Changes in weight, anthropometry, and CHI were calculated by regression analysis. Data calculated at 7-,14-, or 18-day intervals were also computed by analysis of variance. Differences between the 28-day periods were examined by the student's paired t test.
Unless otherwise noted, the data in the text and tables are expressed as the mean + standard deviation, and in the figures as the mean + standard error of the mean.
1. Food Intake
Although there were differences among
children, on a group basis food intake did not differ significantly from week to
week. Febrile episodes were usually accompanied by anorexia, resulting in
diminished food intakes. In most cases these episodes were followed by a
transient increase above the food intake preceding the illness.
2. Growth
Table 4 and figure 1 show the anthropometric
changes. a. Weight: One child (402) did not gain weight and two (401, 410)
gained at a rate slower than the 0.45 to 0.50 g/kg/day expected for healthy
children of the same height-age. In contrast, two children (404,405) gained
weight at more than twice that rate. b. Height: Five children grew at the
expected rate of 0.30 to 0.34 mm/day. The other six children grew more (0.43 to
0.64 mm/day). This resulted in some catch-up growth, as shown in figure 2. c.
Weight-for-height: Maximum individual changes were + 3 per cent. There were no
changes on a group basis. d. Other anthropometric measurements: A small decrease
in tricipital skin-fold thickness resulted in a slight increment of lean arm
diameter, since there were no changes in arm circumference.
3. Protein Intake, Digestibility, and Balance
Figure 3
and table 5 give the individual and group data. Protein intake accounted for 8.8
± 1.1 per cent of the net dietary energy. Mean protein intakes were high (1.75 ±
0.22 g/kg/day), and apparent digestibilities were about 72 ± 5 per cent, greater
in period I than 11 by 3 per cent. "True" digestibilities were about 7
per cent higher than apparent digestibilities. The average amount of protein
"truly" absorbed was 1.46 ± 0.17 g/kg/day.
TABLE 4. Average Values and Rates of Change in Anthropometric Measurements and CHI of 11 Children during Periods I and II
Average values | Period I | Period II | Mean of I and II | Paired t I vs. II a |
Weight (kg) | 11.98 ± 0.80*b | 12.12 ± 0.89 | 12.05 ± 0.83 | 2.367 |
Height (cm) | 84.5 ± 4.3* | 85.7± 4.3 | 85.1±4.2 | 6.120 |
Weight-for-height 1%)c | 99±4 | 100±5 | 99±4 | 0.810 |
Arm circumference (cm) | 16.1±0.8 | 16.0±0.9 | 16.0 ± 0.8 | 0.088 |
Lean arm diameter (cm)d | 42.9± 1.5* | 43.6±1.6 | 43.2 ± 1.6 | 3.169 |
Subcutaneous skin-fold thicknessese | 17,6±3.1* | 16.5±3.2 | 17.0 ± 3.1 | 2.300 |
CHI (units)f | 80±0.13 | 0.82±0.12 | 0.82 ± 0.12 | 1.847 |
Rates of change | ||||
Weight (g/day) | 10.6 ± 8.7 | 3,7 ± 6.4 | 7.2±8.2 | 1,987 |
Weight (g/kg/day) | 0.87±0.70 | 0.29±0,54 | 0.58±0.68 | 1.955 |
Height (mm/day) | 0.41 ± 0.16 | 0.46± 0.23 | 0.43± 0.12 | 0.565 |
Lean arm diameter (mm/day) | 0.02± 0.04 | 0.02± 0,04 | 0.02± 0.02 | 0.140 |
Subcutaneous skin-fold thicknesses (mm/day) | - 0.01 ± 0.06 | - 0.04 ± 0.03 | - 0.03 ± 0.04 | 1.342 |
CHI [units/Period) | 0.035 ± 0.103 | 0,011 ± 0.106 | 0.023 ± 0.103 | 0.812 |
a For 10 degrees of freedom p<0.05 = 2.228 and p<0.01 = 3.169.
b
Mean ± standard deviation,
c Weight expected for height: 100 per cent = 50th
percentile of Boston standards.
d Corrected for subcutaneous skin-fold
thickness.
e Sum of 3 sites: tricipital, subscapular, and paraumbilical.
f Creatinine-height index calculated from urine excreted on days without meat
ingestion.
g Weight changes calculated by- individual regression analyses
over 28 days. All other changes by individual differences between days 0 and 28
[Period 1) and between days 28 and 56 (period 11).
* Mean values of the two
periods differ (see paired t value),
TABLE 5. Metabolic Balance Studies and Energy Expenditures in Periods I and II
(11 Children) a | ||||
Period I |
Period II |
Mean of I and IIb |
Paired t I vs IIb | |
Protein | ||||
Protein intakec (g/kg/day) |
1.85 ± 0.19 d |
1.85 ± 0.25 |
1.85 ± 0.22 |
0.183 |
Apparent digestibility (%) |
73.6 ± 4.6* |
70.6 ± 4.7 |
72.1 ± 4.8 |
3.100 |
"True" digestibility e (%) |
80.4 ± 4.6* |
77.4 ± 4.7 |
78.9 ± 4.8 | |
Nitrogen balance f (mg/kg/day) 98.0 ± 20.6 |
82.3 ± 20.6 |
90.2 ± 2.16 |
1.905 | |
p% g (% energy) |
8.6 ± 0.9 |
8.9 ± 1.3 |
8.8 ± 1.1 |
1.847 |
Energy | ||||
Gross intakeh (kcal/kg/day) |
93.6 ± 4.6 |
90.9 ± 4.8 |
92.3 ± 4.8 |
1.415 |
Apparent absorption, (%) |
91.9 ± 1.6 |
91.2 ± 1.7 |
91.6 + 1.6 |
1.326 |
Net intakei (kcal/kg/day) |
85.9 ± 4.3 |
83.2 ± 4.8 |
84.6 ± 4.7 |
1.383 |
Total energy expanditure j (kcal/kg/day) |
76.6 ± 8.6 |
73.0 ± 6.3 |
74.8 ± 7.6 |
2.188 |
Energy balancek (kcal/kg/day) |
8.2 ± 10.1 |
9.7 ± 6.2 |
9,0 ± 8.2 |
0.589 |
Basal energy expenditure, | ||||
(kcal/kg/hr) |
- |
- |
1.33 ± 0.25 |
- |
(kcal/m² /fur) |
- |
- |
54.2 ± 5.4 |
- |
a. Balance data and digestibilities calculated from intakes and excrete
collected seven times at 4-day intervals in each 28-day period.
b. For 10
degrees of freedom p.<0.05 = 2.228 and p<0.01 - 3.169.
c. Protein =
nitrogen (Kjeldahl) x 6.25.
d. Mean ± standard deviation.
e.
"True" digestibility calculated assuming obligatory faecal nitrogen
loss of 20mg/kg/day.
f. Nitrogen balance [apparent) = intake urinary
excretion faecal excretion. No allowance made for sweat and other
insensible losses.
g. P% = proportion of dietary energy derived from
proteins = (protein intake, g x 4) + net energy intake x 100.
h. Gross
energy intake determined by bomb calorimetry of the foods ingested.
i. Net
energy intake = gross intakefaecal energy (bomb calorimetry).
j. Total
energy expenditure calculated from heart rate and the corresponding heart
rateenergy expenditure relationship during 14 hours of the day 16 a.m. to
8 p.m.) and from basal energy expenditure during 10 hours (8 p.m. to 6 a.m.)
k. Energy balance = net intake urinary losses 15 kcal/g urinary
nitrogen) -- sweat losses 18 kcal/g sweat nitrogen = approximately 0.1
kcal/kg/day)total energy expenditure.
* Mean values of the two periods
differ (see t value).
Apparent nitrogen balance was also high. All children retained at least twice the amount estimated for normal growth and to compensate for insensible losses (about 15 plus 9 mg N/kg/day, respectively).
Figure 3 indicates that only two children (405, 411) had protein intakes below the population estimates given in table 1. Their P%'s were also the lowest in the group, and their apparent digestibilities were near the group mean. Child 405 had the lowest nitrogen balance and child 411 retained 70.5 mg N/kg/day in period 11 when his intake. was only 1.36 9 protein/kg/day. Neither child had clinical signs of protein deficiency, both grew well, and their CHI, haemoglobin concentrations, and other biochemical measurements did not differ from the group. Child 404 had the highest food and protein intakes and the highest P% of the group. He had a high faecal output and his apparent nitrogen digestibility was 64 per cent in both periods of the study. As a result of this, he absorbed 1.46 9 protein/kg/day in the two periods and his nitrogen balance was only 53.1 mg N/kg/day in period 11; in period I it was 92.3 mg N/kg/day.
4. Basal and Total Energy Expenditure
Each child's
basal energy expenditure varied little throughout the study. Therefore, each
child's mean value was used to compute his total energy expenditure. Table 5
shows the group's basal expenditure. Child 414 was higher than the rest, with
67.2 kcal/m2/hr (2.88 kcal/kg/hr). Basal expenditure varied among the other
children from 47.7 to 58.4 kcal/m2/hr (2.11 to 2.65 kcal/kg/hr). These values
agree with those of similar children measured by the same method.
Figure 4 shows the range of individual total daily energy expenditures. The average daily energy expenditure did not vary between periods and the medical and nursing staff did not notice changes in the pattern or duration of the children's physical activity, except when they were ill.
5. Energy Intake, Absorption, and Balance
Figure 4 and
table 5 give the individual and group data. Gross intakes during the days of
excrete collection ranged from 85 to 100 kcal/kg/day. These were to a certain
extent independent of total food intake during period 1, since the energy
density of each child's diet was adjusted when the preceding week's intake was
not between 87 and 97 kcal/kg/day. Apparent absorptions had a low coefficient of
variability (1.7 per cent), and, except for child 414 who absorbed 88.6 per cent
of the energy ingested, ranged from 91 to 94 per cent. Net energy intakes were,
on the average, 8.4 per cent lower than gross intakes.
The estimates of urinary and sweat energy losses varied from 0.8 to 1.1 kcal/kg/day. Total daily energy expenditures and the energy balance results coincided with those from another study with similar children and equivalent dietary energy intakes. The energy balance ranged between-7.6 and 24.6 kcal/kg/day in period 1, and between -4.8 and 21.2 kcal/kg/day in period 11 (see figure 4).
TABLE 6. Blood Chemistry and Haematology during Periods I and II
Days on the study | |||||
0 |
18 |
36 |
54 | ||
Packed red cell volume | % |
36 ± 2* |
35 ± 2** |
37 ± 1 |
37 ± 2 |
Haemoglobin | g/dl |
12.4 ±0.8 |
12.2 ±07 |
12.4±0.6 |
12.3 ±0.6 |
Plasma proteins | g/dl |
7.2 ± 0.4 |
7.0 ± 0.4 |
7.1 ±0.3 |
6.8 ± 0.4 t |
Serum albumin | g/dl |
3.8 ± 0.6 |
4.1 ± 0.6 |
3.8 ±0.4 |
3.7 ± 0.7 |
Serum amino acid ratio non-essential/essential |
1.68 ± 0.44 |
1.61 ± 0.40 |
1.38 ±0.31 |
1.42 ±0.35 |
* Mean + standard deviation, n = 11.
** Lower than on days 36 and 54. F
(3,40) = 3.072, p < 0.05, L.S.D. = 2.
t Lower than initial (day 0)
values, student's paired t = 3.253, p < 0.01
6. Haematological and Biochemical Analyses
Table 6 gives
the results of the analyses performed on blood, serum, and plasma. Analyses of
variance indicated a small, transient decrease in packed red blood cell volume
on day 18 (p < 0.05). The analysis of variance did not show differences among
the other haematological and biochemical determinations. However, the paired
comparison of initial and final values indicated decrease in total plasma
protein concentration (p < 0.01 ) not accompanied by a decrease in albumin
concentration.
(a) dietary energy density was increased, and
(b) sufficient amounts of the staple foods were available.
Acknowledgements
The investigations were carried out with the financial assistance of the Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA) and the United Kingdom's Office for Overseas Development. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) administered funds from DANIDA and made the award to INCAP.